Sunday 14 October 2012

Would anyone really poison Frank Schleck?

It seems like a ridiculous thing to say: I find it hard to believe that Johan Bruyneel, no matter how aggrieved he felt with either of the Schlecks, would stoop to actually poisoning them.

I can almost - almost - understand the idea of someone in his position giving a rider an illegal drug in order that they would fail a doping test, just out of spite.

I can certainly imagine one team setting out to "dope" a rival rider: or a demented fan (or cycling hater) doing something like that - if you remember, when Frankie's adverse finding was first reported, that was our main thought, that Frankie had accidentally taken a bidon meant for someone else.

Whether it was a doping rider's usual "special" bidon, or  merely a randomly contaminated bidon,  both suggestions were equally valid:  likewise whether it was meant for Frankie, or whether he grabbed it by mistake, again, we would never know.

But in all those cases, it would be done by someone outside the team. I find it very hard to believe that anyone in the management would do anything to harm one of their own riders - I believe the phrase is "cutting off your nose to spite your face."

It's not as though Shack have so many UCI points that they don't need any more.

But even if that were the case, and it was done by someone within the team, either by Mr Bruyneel, or at his direction - to give Frankie something that could possibly kill him?  There's a world of difference between giving a rider something that would cause him to fail doping, and something that might cause his heart to fail.

I don't quite see that happening.

But as Inge said (comments, last post), it's a bit of a coincidence that Frankie's hearing was postponed for a week, and within that week, we have had the suggestion - it came from L'Equipe, which I would have thought was a fairly respectable sports journal - that it was deliberate poisoning, to prevent him from being attractive to any other teams.

(As though he would leave Andy behind, pffff!)

Meanwhile, Andy has had some reasonable days of riding in Beijing: we haven't seen much of him, and he didn't quite finish the race, but the DS on the Shack site said that he'd had four good days of racing, and would now be going straight on into training, through the winter, in the sure and certain  hope that next season would be considerably better than this one, in every single way.

Meanwhile, somewhere in Beijing:

Reporter: So, Andy, what's all this about Mr Bruyneel poisoning your brother?
Andy: *stony silence*, face somewhat reminiscent of small child presented with spoonful of stewed prunes and wordlessly conveying the message "no, I won't eat it."

 Is that Sprite he's drinking?

Oh, and what's that on his upper lip? No, Andy, not another attempt to grow the Caterpillar of Doom, please!

5 comments:

  1. I don't like the use of the word "poisoned" but given what we are reading from USADA, it wouldn't surprise me to find out that the team were being given tainted supplements and recovery drinks without their knowledge or consent. Would you send everything that the team gave you to the lab for testing, or would you assume that because it came from the team that it was a clean product? My impression is that both Frank and Andy are pretty trusting individuals. I don't know how Frank can prove anything, but I also don't know how his case can proceed fairly now, either. The WADA code seems very strict in terms that the athlete is responsible for whatever substances are found in their system, so unless there is hard evidence, it may just be a matter of procedure anyway.

    It was lovely to see pictures of Andy racing again.

    Kat

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am half way through reading the full report of the USADA, and I am quite shocked by it all. The fact that Lance doped himself is already bad enough, but the fact that he and Bruyneel basically forced his teammates to do the same is even worse (to put it mildly). Zabriskie's describing himself as scared to death that they would put someone else's blood back in (and thus putting his life at danger) made me feel very uncomfortable.

    I think that with what both Lance and Bruyneel have done, they've put many people at very high risk of very serious and possible life threatening health problems. (and I think they can consider themselves lucky they've not been arrested for that, yet!)

    So even though I find it unlikely, it could be that Bruyneel (or one of the former USPS team doctors, if I remember correctly, one of them work(ed) for RSNT) has something to do with it. If so, Bruyneel is even worse than I already think he is. But even if it's true, I agree with Kat that it will be very difficult for Frankie to prove this.

    I was happy too, to see Andy back racing. He said in an interview with a Dutch newspaper that he was going to live in Spain for the winter to train in better weather conditions and that he wants to start his season early and peak earlier.

    Inge

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Kat, you are quite right, just look at the Contador episode. I believe I said at the time "Mate, just take the ban and continue to state that you are innocent." If he had done so, we would not have had all this removing-of-winning-places and awarding-of-second-hand-wins business.

    And I said the same to Frankie a few posts ago: Frankie, we all believe in you, but if it comes to a ban, please, please, take it like a man and just accept the ban, with head held high. By all means continue to search for whatever item it was that contained the diuretic, but don't go to appeal and drag it out for two years.

    Even though *she whispers very quietly* it was suggested that by doing so, you could avoid having to work with Mr Bruyneel until your contract expired.... But look! He's gone!

    And I have to say it, although I regret saying it: Frankie, you, just like Contador, will forever be tainted with this doping scandal, whether you protest your innocence, fight the ban, or not.

    So you might as well try to get the shortest possible ban, and get the whole thing over and done with.

    Inge, I think that none of us want to believe that Mr Bruyneel, or one of his henchman, would deliberately contaminate a rider. If it ever comes out that he admits doing so, I will be shocked. But not surprised.

    I do remember that last year, when this merger was announced, a whole lot of people - not just Schlecklanders - said that they had serious reservations about letting Bruyneel "get his hands on" the Schlecks. At the time, they were suggesting that Mr B would force our boys to dope, so there are plenty of people out there who think that he is quite capable of doing something that bad.

    But, *laughs* who remembers him recently saying something like "the Schlecks are very hard to work with." Ha! Ha! Well done, lads, you clearly didn't do whatever it was that he wanted you to do!

    Coug
    PS So, Andy's in Spain for the winter, eh? Lucky him, sunshine (written in the UK in pouring rain and howling winds, seriously considering moving out of shorts and into "longs" for work)and nice weather. Wonder if TinkerJil gets to go with him?

    ReplyDelete
  4. We experienced our first (of the season) high rain warning this weekend, Coug (complete with wind gusts that rattled the walls). That said, I changed to my "longs" (for me that means sweaters) way back in early September, so I have sympathy for those of you who work outside at this time of year.

    Just from the little reports about his training plans, I am already sensing a different attitude about next season in Andy. Good for him! - Kat

    ReplyDelete
  5. Centuries ago something nice happened.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygO43_mro5g&feature=youtu.be

    Barbara.

    ReplyDelete